Course Project - Report Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Course Project - declare - Assignment Exampleenergy needs. 4) To give a personal opinion regarding the hydraulic fracturing process and the laws that should be instituted. INTRODUCTION Hydraulic fracturing refers to a process used to extract fumble or rock oil from on a lower floor the earths out-of-doors by pumping liquid at high insistence to the subsurface rocks. The pressure in this liquid is enough to fracture the rocks thus establishing interconnected networks of fractures that are wherefore used as pores for the oil and gas to move to the bored well. It is from this well that the final extraction is make. The process has been so furthermost effective and efficient in so far as extraction of oil and natural gas is concerned (Wilber, 2012). Nonetheless, various legal and environmental issues have been embossed regarding the process. Its impacts on the environment have non augured well with a majority of the environmentalists. Similarly, various legal concerns have been raised and they vary from one postulate to the next. In this paper, I seek to present a report on the hydraulic fracturing process, the legal and environmental issues, as well as offer some of recommendations regarding the process. DISCUSSION Hydraulic fracturing process raises various issues both(prenominal) legally and environmentally. The water contamination by the chemicals used during the fracking process has brought out legal issues of strict financial obligation where individuals have asserted harm from such contaminated water. In a Pennsylvanian case of Fiorentino v. Cabot anoint & heavy weapon Corp., No. 09-cv-2284 (M.D. Pa. November 15, 2010), the complainant seeks action to be taken against the oil and gas company. This follows the alleged contamination of the plaintiffs water by methane and new(prenominal) toxins. The court refused to dismiss this case and hence opened a look into allowing plaintiff come up with a claim of strict liability against the hydraulic f racturing companies (U.S. ENVTL. PROT. AGENCY, 2009). The other legal issue presented by the hydraulic fracturing is who is to be held responsible in cases of harm occasioned by the process. From the Fiorentino v. Cabot Oil & Gas Corp.case, it appears that it becomes an issue to the courts to determine the liability of the fracturing company and hence seeks to follow up and develop a rule suitable for this situation. Strict liability seems to have been inapplicable in such issues from the way the suspect presents his case in these proceedings. While various states are embracing this process in gas and oil extraction, other states have banned it and hence are an illegal process. However, some states have left the readiness to the local leaders to decide whether the process should be permitted or not. Permitting such a process is done after various considerations depending on the local leaders take on the public health and safety in case of a flag to engage in the extraction process . The environmental concerns so raised by the hydraulic process are vast and alarming. First, there is a threat of contamination of the surreptitious water brought about by the spillage of the gases and oil extracted. Most of this underground water is a opening of drinking water to many, both human and the animals. In an event of contamination of the drinking water then the vast population is affected. Secondly the use of a lot of water from the ground water and the surface water during drilling and the hydraulic fracturing brings a lot of stress to these water suppliers. The drilling and fracturing